Forage quality of range species and daily requirement of Sangesary sheep in  Firozkhoh mountain rangelands

Arzani, Hosein; Motamedi, Javad; Mirhaji, Taghi

doi:10.22092/ijrdr.2018.117816

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

¹ Professor,Department of Reclamation of Arid and Mountainous Regions, Natural Resources Faculty, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran

² Associate Professor, Rangeland Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

³ Research Expert, Rangeland Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2018.117816

Abstract

Knowledge of the animal daily requirement in rangelands is one of the essential requirements to calculate the grazing capacity in rangeland plans. In this regard, the daily metabolizable energy requirements of different Sangesary sheep (ewe, ram, and lamb) were investigated. For this purpose, according to the average values of forage quality indices and the proportion of species in the plant composition, the amount of metabolizable energy in one kilogram of dry forage at different growth stages was estimated, and considering the daily metabolizable energy requirement, the amount of forage that supplies the animal was estimated. The daily metabolizable energy requirement was calculated according to the proposed MAFF (1984) equation under grazing condition regarding the physical properties of the rangelands, water distribution intervals, plant density, and applying an incremental coefficient of 70%. Based on the results, the amount of forage needed to meet the daily needs of the ewe of the Sangesary sheep with a mean weight of 37 kg in the early, mid, and late growing season was estimated to be 1.6, 2.1 and 2.3 kg dry matter, respectively. The values for adult rams with an average weight of 48.75 kg were estimated to be 1.9, 2.5 and 2.9 kg in different growth stages. The lambs' daily requirement with an average weight of 19.88 kg was estimated to be 1.3, 1.7, and 1.9 in each growing season. The results showed that considering the amount of 1.5 kg of dry matter forage to meet the daily requirements of different kinds of animals grazing in rangelands is not correct and animal requirement need be determined based on forage quality in phenologiacal stages.In addition, the results emphasize that in order to adapt the daily requirements of animal to the forage quality, it is necessary to consider the values of forage quality indices and the proportion of all species grazed in the plant composition, so that the results should not be limited to the species in animal diet. Otherwise, as in the present study, the estimated requirement is more than the daily intake of animal grazing on rangelands.

Keywords

References

- AOAC., 2000. Official methods of analysis, 17^th Ed., Association of official analytical chemists (Animal Feed, chapter 4, p. 54): Arlington: AOAC International.

- Arzani, H., 2009. Forage quality and daily requirement of grazing animal. University of Tehran Press, 354p.

- Arzani, H., Motamedi, J. and Zare Chahouki, M. A., 2010. Report of national project “Forage quality of range species in Iran”. Forests, Range and Watershed Management Organization (FRWO), 325p.

- Arzani, H., Motamedi, J., Aghajanloo, F., Rashtvand, S. and Zarei, A., 2016. Forage quality of important range species in the mountainous highland of Alamut (Qazvin) and Badamstan (Zanjan). Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 69(4): 805-818.

- Arzani, H., Motamedi, J., Jafari, M., Farahpoor, M. and Zare Chahoki, M. A., 2013. Classification of forage quality index in highland rangelands if Taleghan. Journal of Range and Desert Research, 20(2): 250-271.

- Arzani, H., Sabri, E., Motamedi, J. and Javadi, A., 2015. Mapping the daily requirement of grazing animal on the rangelands of West Azerbaijan. Journal of Range and Desert Research, 22(1): 158-167.

- Atrian, P., 2009. Sheep Nutrition. Aiizh press, 348p.

- Belich, V. C., J. G., Kie, E. R., Loft, T. R., Stephenson, M.W., Oehler, S. L. and Medina, A. L., 2005. Managing rangelands for wildlife, 873-897: In: Braun, CE (Eds.), Techniques for Wildlife investigations and management The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

- Corbett, J. L., 1987. Energy and protein utilization by grazing animals, 415-422. In: Wheeler J. L, Pearson C. J. and Roberts, G. E (Eds.), Temperate pastures, their production, use and management Australian Wool Corporation, Collingswood. Vic.

- Fayaz, M. and Yaghaneh. H., 2015. Preference value of range plants of Iran, Vol. 1: Semi-steppic and high mountains rangelands. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands (RIFR), 380p.

- Finlayson, J. D., Cacho, O. J. and By water, A. C., 1995. A simulation model for grazing sheep: 1. Animal growth and intake, Agricultural Systems, 48: 1-25.

- Freer, M. and Dove, H., 2002. Sheep Nutrition. CABI Publishing in association with CSIRO, 540p.

- Ganskopp, D. and Bohnert, D., 2006. Do pasture-scale nutritional patterns affect cattle distribution on rangelands, Rangeland Ecology Management, 59:189-196.

- Graham, N. M., 2001. Energy needs of grazing ruminant livestock, Nutrient Society, 8:64-71.

- Holechek, J. L., Pieper, R. D. and Herbel, C. H., 2005. Range management (Principles and Practices). Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliff, 587 pp.

- MAFF, Ministry of Agriculture Fisheris and Food., 1984. Energy allowances and feeding systems for ruminants, ADAS reference book 433. HMSO, London, 98p.

- Motamedi, J., 2011. A model of estimating short-term and long-term grazing capacity for animal and rangeland forage equilibrium. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran, 352p.

- Nicol, E. M., 1987. Livestock Feeding on Pasture. New Zealand Society of Animal Production, Occasional Publixation, 10: 145p.

- Nikkhah, A. and Amanlo, H., 1991. Energy Allowances and Feeding System for Ruminants. University of Zanjan press, 130p.

- NRC., 2000. Nutrient requirements of beef of cattle. National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.

- Oddy, V. H., Robards, G. E. and Low, S. G., 1983. Prediction of in-vivo dry matter digestibility from the fiber nitrogen content of a feed, 395-398. In: Robards GE and Packham RG (Eds.), Feed information and animal production Commonwealth Agricultural Bureaux, Farnham Royal, UK.

- Rhodes, B.D. and Sharrow, S. H., 1990. Effect of grazing by sheep on the quantity and quality of forage available to big game in Oregon, coast range, Journal of Range Management, 43: 235-237.

- Richard W. S., Kirkman, F. K. P. and Riaan Dames, 2017. Optimal grazing management strategies: evaluating key concepts. African Journal of Range & Forage Science, 34 (2): 87-98.

- Richardson, F. D., Hahn, B. D. and Schoeman, S. J., 2002. Modeling nutrient utilization by livestock grazing semi-arid rangeland, 263-280. In: McNamara JP, France J and Beever D (Eds.), Modelling nutrient utilization in farm animals, CABI, Wallingford, UK.

- Standing Committee on Agriculture (SCA), CSIRO (1990). Australia, 102p.

- Van Soest, P. J., 1994. Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 137p.

- Viviane Rodrigues Verdolin dos Santos, Concepta McManus, Vanessa Peripolli, Candice Bergmann Tanure, Paulo de Mello, Tavares Lima, Patrícia Spoto Corrêa, Daiana Lima Brito, Sônia Emília Figueiredo de Araújo Torres, Helder Louvandini, 2017. Dry matter intake, performance and carcass characteristics of hair sheep reared. Scientia Agricola, 74 (6): 436-442.

Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research

Forage quality of range species and daily requirement of Sangesary sheep in Firozkhoh mountain rangelands

References

References

Volume 25, Issue 3
November 2018
Pages 657-670

Forage quality of range species and daily requirement of Sangesary sheep in Firozkhoh mountain rangelands

References

References

Volume 25, Issue 3November 2018Pages 657-670

Volume 25, Issue 3
November 2018
Pages 657-670