Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant professor, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

2 Graduated in Range Management Engineering, Department of Range and Watershed Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Iran

10.22092/ijrdr.2023.129900

Abstract

Background and objectives
 The growth of the population and the increase in food needs have caused humankind to turn to manipulating nature and converting natural lands into crops, especially rainfed agriculture, to provide the food they need. For various reasons, a large part of these lands is abandoned every year, which causes many changes in the physical and chemical properties of the soil. This research aimed to compare the most important physical and chemical characteristics of soil in two land uses, including rangeland and abandoned rainfed in Kurdistan province.
 
Methodology
 This research was carried out in Kurdistan province. For this purpose, four regions, including Kilak, Salavat­Abad, Sarab­Qamish, and Mamukh, were selected in Sanandaj city. In each region, two neighboring rangelands and abandoned drylands were selected. Three 100-meter transects were established in each land use by random-systematic method, and soil samples were collected from 0-30 cm depth. Depending on the conditions and area of the region, 20 composite samples were taken in Kilak, 20 Salavat Abad, 14 Sarab Qamish, and 8 Mamukh. Half of the samples were collected in rangeland, and the other half in abandoned dryland. In the laboratory, soil physical and chemical factors, including acidity, electrical conductivity, absorbable potassium, percentage of soil organic carbon, total nitrogen, available phosphorus, soil texture, and bulk density, were measured by usual laboratory methods. A factorial experiment was conducted using a completely randomized design to analyze the data. The Duncan test was used to compare the means.
 
Results
 The results showed no significant difference in the percentage of clay, silt, sand, and specific mass in the comparison of rangelands in four regions, the comparison of abandoned dryland in the four regions, and the comparison of abandoned dryland in each region. The comparison of the average acidity of abandoned rangeland and dryland did not show any significant difference in any region. Electrical conductivity in Kilak, Salavat Abad, and Sarab Qamish areas was higher than in dryland. However, only in Kilak was there a statistically significant difference. The electrical conductivity of rangeland soil was 143; in abandoned wetlands, it was 109.
The comparison of abandoned rangelands and drylands in terms of total nitrogen and carbon numerical values showed that rangelands were more than abandoned drylands in all areas. This meant that nitrogen was 24%, 40%, and 42.8% higher in the Kilak, Sarab Qamish, and Mamukh regions. And statistically, their difference was significant. Also, the carbon difference between the rangeland and the dryland in Mamukh was statistically significant (1.47% in the rangeland and 0.74% in the dryland). There was a significant difference in the amount of phosphorus between the rangeland, 94 mg/kg, and the abandoned dryland, with 234 mg/kg only in the Mamukh region. Only in the Sarab Qamish area was soil potassium higher than in the rangeland by 24.7% in the abandoned dryland.
Comparing rangelands and abandoned drylands in terms of the numerical amount of total nitrogen and carbon, it can be concluded that in all areas, the rangeland was more than the abandoned drylands, so that nitrogen in Kilak, Sarab-Qamish and Mamukh regions was 24, 40, respectively, and 42.8% more, their difference was statistically significant and also the carbon difference in Mamukh was statistically significant (rangeland 1.47% and dryland 0.74%). There was a significant difference in phosphorus between rangeland, 94 mg/kg, and abandoned dryland, 234 mg/kg only in the Mamukh area. There was a significant increase in soil potassium in abandoned drylands by 24.7% over rangeland soil in the Sarab-Qamish region.
 
Conclusion
 This research indicates that the change of land use from rangeland to dryland and then abandonment will change the soil's physical and chemical properties. After about 40 years since the drylands were abandoned, there has been an improvement in most of the physical and chemical factors investigated in this research. In this research, 40 years have been considered. It is suggested to consider different periods in the secondary sequence in future research. This will enable us to determine more precisely when the soil can improve. Also, similar research should be done in other ecological regions with different conditions so that the effect of climatic and topographical factors can be clearly defined.

Keywords

Azadi, H., Lebailly, P.H., Azhdari, G.H. and Eghdami, H., 2019. Impact of land use changes on soil and vegetation characteristics in Fereydan, Iran. Journal Agriculture. 9: 58. 8; DOI:10.3390/agriculture9030058
Akhzari, D. and Ahmaddi, S., 2019. The effect of conversion of rangelands to agricultural lands on some chemical and physical properties of soil (Case study: Gonbad village of Hamadan city). Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 21(87):135-146.
Ahmadi Elkhchi, A., Haj Abbasi, M.A. and Jalalian, A., 2003. Effects of converting range to dry-farming land on runoff and soil loss and quality in dorahan, Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari Province. Journal of Crop Production and Processing 2003; 6 (4) :103-115 (In Persian).
Baranian Kabir, A., Bashari, H., Mossadeghi, M.R. and Basiri, M., 2017. Effects of land use change on soil sustainability and organic matter. Journal of Agriculture and Soil Science. 8: 1-15.
Brejda, J.J., Moorman, T.B., Karlen, D.L. and Dao, T.H., 2000. Identification of regional soil quality factors and indicators: I. Central and southern highy plains. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 64: 2115-2124.
Carter, M.R., Gregorich, E.G., Anderson, D.W., Doran, J.W., Janson, H.H. and Pierce, F.J., 1997. Concepts of soil quality and their significance. PP, in: Methods for Assessing Soil Quality. Soil Science Society of America Journal, Special Pub, No.49, and Madison, WI.  
Day, P.R., 1982. Particle fractionation and particle-size analysis. Pp. 545-567. In: Black CA. (ed). Methods of soil Analysis. Agronomy Monograph, WI.
Esmaili, A. and Abdollahi, K.H., 2010. Watershed management and soil protection. Mohaghegh Ardabili Publications. 600 P (In Persian).
Ebrahimi, M., Kashani, S. and Ruhi Moghaddam, A., 2016. The effect of changing rangeland uses to agriculture on soil fertility in Taftan area. Journal of Soil and Water Science, 26( 2): 31-44 (In Persian).
Jackson, T.,2006. The earthscan reader in sustainable consumption. Earthscan, London, 402 p.
Khatir Pasha, N., Hojjati, M., Pourmajidian, M.R. and Asadian, M., 2017. The effect of land use change on physical, chemical and biological properties of soil in Ghalak forest of Ghaemshahr city. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation Research, 24(6): 211-225 (In Persian with English summary).
Kay, B.D., 1990. Rates of change of soil structure under different crop systems. Advances in Soil Science, 12: 1-52.
Kashem, M.A., Ahmed, A., Hoque, S. and Hossain, M.Z., 2016. Effects of land-use change on the properties of top soil of deciduous Sal Forest in Bangladesh. Journal of Mountain Area Research. p. 5-12.  DOI.org/10.53874/jmar.v1i0.7
Khresat, S., Al-Bakri, J. and Tahhan, R., 2008. Impacts of land use / land cover change on soil properties in the Mediterranean region of northwestern Jordan. Land Degradation & Development. DOI: 10.1002/ldr.847
Krik, P.L.,1950. Kjeldahl method for total nitrogen. Anal. Chem. 22: 354-358.
Lizaga, I., Quijano, L., Gaspar, L., ConcepcionRamos, M. and Navas, A., 2018. Linking land use changes to variation in soil properties in a mediterranean mountain agroecosystem. Catena, 172: 516-527. doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2018.09.019.
Mohammadi, P., 2016. Investigating the effect of different land uses on some soil chemical properties in Jamalabad area of Baft city. Journal of Rangeland and Watershed Management, Iranian Journal of Natural Resources, Volume 69, Number 4, pp. 1063-1073 (In Persian with English summary).
Mesdaghi, M., 2010. Rangeland in Iran (sixth edition). Published by Imam Reza University. Mashhad, 336 p (In Persian).
Mehmandoost, F., Oliaei, H.R., Adhami, A. and Naghiha, R., 2018. The effect of land change on some physicochemical and biological properties of soil in Sarvak region, Yasuj city. Journal of Water and Soil (Agricultural Sciences and Industries), 32(3): 587-599. (In Persian with English summary)
McLeen, E., 1982. Soil pH and lime requirement. In: Page, A.L. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analays. Part 2. chemical and microbiological properties. Agron, 9, ASSA-SSA, Madison, Wl. USA. Pp: 199-223.
Niknahad Qarmakher, H. and Maramaie, M.G.H., 2011. Study of the effects of land use change on soil properties, a case study of Kichak watershed. Journal of Soil Management and Sustainable Production, 1(2): 81-96 (In Persian with English summary).
Newman, E.L., Rosalie, E. and Andrews, A., 1973. Uptake of phosphorus and potassium in relation to root growth and root density. Plant and Soil, 38 (1): 49-69
Olsen, S.R., Cole, C.V., Watanabe, F.S. and Dean, L.A., 1954. Estimation of available P in soils by extraction with sodium bicarbonate. USDA circular. 939:1-19.
Pakdel, M. and Maleki, M., 2020. Investigating the rate of land use change in Bileh Savar city of Ardabil province, after the nationalization of the law of forests and rangelands. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 27(4):782-791. DOI.org/10.22092/ijrdr.2020.123153 (In Persian with English summary)
Parsa Doost, F., Eskandari, Z., Bahraini Nejad, B. and Jafari Ardakani, A., 2015. Comparison of some chemical and biological characteristics of soil in different land uses in the first and end of the growing season in Fereydoon area of Isfahan. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources, Soil and Water Sciences, 19(71): 11-18 (In Persian with English summary).
Pichand, M., 2017. Study of the effect of conversion of rangeland to other agricultural uses on some physical and chemical properties of soil, a case study of Imameh watershed. Iranian Natural Ecosystems Quarterly, 8(1):99-122 (In Persian with English summary).
Page, M.C., Sparks, D.L., Woll, M.R. and Hendricks, G.J., 1987. Kinetics and mechanisms of potassium release from sandy mMiddle Atlantic coastal plain Soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 51:1460- 1465.
Rowell, D.L, 1993. Soil Science: Methods and Applications. Longman, Harlow, Essex.
Sanchez-Maranon, M., Soriano, M., Delgado, G., and Delgado, R. 2002. Soil quality in mediterranean mountain environments effects of land use change. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 66: 948- 958.
Sun, D., Yanga, H., Guana, D., Yangc, M., Wu, J., Yuana, F., Jin, C. and Wanga, A. and Zhangd, Y., 2018. The effects of land use change on soil infiltration capacity in China: A meta-analysis. Volume 626, Science of The Total Environment  DOI.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.01.104
Walkley, A. and Black, I.A., 1934. Review examination of the degtjareff method determining soil organic matter and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Journal of Soil Science, 34: 29-38.
Willy, D.k., Muyanga, M., Mbuvi, J. and Jayne, T., 2019. The effect of land use change on soil fertility parameters in densely populated areas of Kenya. Geoderma, 343: 254-262. DOI.org/10.1016/j.geoderma.2019.02.033
World Bank., 2005. Islamic republic of Iran: Cost Assessment of Environmental Degradation, Sector Note. Washington, D.C.
Yousefi Fard, M., Jalalian, A. and Khademi, H., 2007. Estimation of soil and nutrient loss due to change of use of rangeland lands using artificial sprinkler. Agricultural Science and Technology and Natural Resources, 11(4): 93-106 (In Persian).
Zare, B and Roghnian, Z., 2015. Futurology in environmental development by scenario method. International Conference on Research in Science and Technology Engineering, Istanbul, Turkey, July 20.
Zhou, Y., Hartemink, A., Shi, Z., Liang, Z., IiLu, Y. 2019. Land use and climate change effects on soil organic carbon in North and Northeast China. Science of the Total Environment, 647: 1230-1238. DOI.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.016