Document Type : Research Paper
Author
Assistant Professor, Department of Rangeland and Watershed Management and Research Group of Drought and Climate Change, Faculty of Natural Resources and Environment, University of Birjand, Birjand, Iran
Abstract
Background and objectives
It seems that there is a mutual relationship between the classes of rangeland conditions and the characteristics of vegetation and biodiversity. However, there is relatively little and contradictory information in this regard. This research was conducted to compare the percentage of cover, litter, density, production, and numerical indicators of biodiversity among 11 types of plants in the Darmian-Sarabisheh protected area.
Methodology
After the field survey and identification of plant types, 11 plant types could be identified in the entire area. Sampling was done by the random-systematic method. For this purpose, three key areas were selected for each plant type, three transects were established in each key area, and 20 plots of 4 square meters were sampled in each transect. In each plot, the percentage of vegetation cover, litter, density, and production was measured. Canopy cover and litter percentage were determined visually. Plant density was calculated by counting plants per unit area. Production was estimated through cover vegetation by double sampling. The Adelaide method was used to estimate shrub production. The range condition was evaluated by the modified four-factor method. Species diversity components, including species richness, evenness, and dominance, were calculated by numerical indices. Also, species abundance distribution models (broken-stick, log-normal, log series, and geometric series) were applied to evaluate plant diversity graphically. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to determine the most accurate fit of species distribution to each statistical model. To compare vegetation characteristics and species diversity components among the 11 studied plant types, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Duncan's multiple range tests were conducted.
Results
The results of the analysis of variance showed that between the 11 plant types studied in terms of vegetation characteristics, including the percentage of vegetation cover, litter, plant density, and production, and numerical indices related to species diversity, including species richness, evenness, and dominance, there is a significant difference at the p≤0.01. The mean comparison results showed that the highest vegetation cover percentage belongs to Artemisia aucheri - Stipa barbata (51.23%) in good condition. Acantholimon scorpinus - Cousinia eryngioides and Eryngium bungei- Cousinia eryngioides (46.27% and 40.44%, respectively) in poor condition are in the next. The highest plant density belongs to Artemisia aucheri - Stipa barbata (157 individuals) in good condition, followed by Eryngium bungei- Lactuca orientalis (126 individuals) in poor condition. Astragalus verus- Artemisia aucheri in good condition and Acantholimon scorpinus - Cousinia eryngioides in poor condition have higher species diversity (H¢=2.51 and 2.48, respectively). The species abundance of Eryngium bungei- Cousinia eryngioides and Eryngium bungei- Lactuca orientalis types (in poor condition) follows the log-normal series, which represents stable communities. Also, Astragalus verus- Artemisia aucheri and Artemisia aucheri- Stipa barbata, which are in good condition, follow the log series and the geometric series, which represent unstable and fragile communities.
Conclusion
Range condition was independent of vegetation cover, production, density, species richness, diversity, evenness, and dominance. Some vegetation types are in poor condition despite high vegetation cover, density, and production. The present study also showed that high species diversity is observed even in the poor-condition class of vegetation types and does not necessarily indicate rangeland stability. Determining ecosystem stability and biodiversity based on species abundance distributions (SADs) is also impossible.
Keywords
- Adams, D.C., Short, R.E., Pfister, J.A., Peterson, K.R., and Hudson, D.B., 1995. New concepts for assessment of rangeland condition. Journal of Range Management, 48(3), 271-282. url: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/644429
- Arzani, H., Abdollahi, J., farahpour, M., Azimi, M., Jafari, A. and Moalemi, M., 2019. Investigation on range condition trend during five years period in Yazd province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 12(3):263-286. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2019.119613. (In Persian).
- Arzani, H. and Abedi, M., 2015. Rangeland assessment: vegetation measurement. University of Tehran Press, 304p (In Persian).
- Azarakhshi, M., Mahdavi, M., Ahmadi, H., Arzani, H., and Farzadmehr, J. 2015. Investigation of the role of temporal distribution of precipitation on forage production value of the rangeland. Journal of Range and Watershed Management, 68(4): 885-899. doi: 10.22059/jrwm.2015.56970. (In Persian)
- Azarnivand, H. and Zare Chahoki, M. A., 2012. Range Improvement. University of Tehran Press. Tehran, Iran. 354 p (In Persian).
- Brown, J.R., 2010. Ecological Sites: Their History, Status, and Future. Rangelands, 32(6): 5-8. doi: 10.2111/RANGELANDS-D-10-00089.1
- Dyksterhuis, E. J., 1949. Condition and management of rangeland based on quantitative ecology. Journal of Range Management 2:104-115. oai:repository.arizona.edu:10150/648220.
- Dyksterhuis, E. J., 1985. Follow-up on range sites and condition classes as based on quantitative ecology. Rangelands, 7(4): 172-173. url: http://hdl.handle.net/10150/638591
- Ejtehadi, H., Sepehri, A. and Akafi, H.R., 2009. Biodiversity measurement methods. Ferdowsi University Press, Mashhad, 228p (In Persian).
- Eslami, H., Motamedi (Torkan), J., Nazarnejad, H., and Sheidaye Karkaj, E., 2019. Investigating the relationship between range condition of plant types and species diversity. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 26(3):613-628. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2019.120003. (In Persian).
- Gholi Nejad, B., 2015. Assessment of plant diversity variation in different condition in Mouchesh rangelands of Kurdistan province, Iran. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 22(2): 298-307. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2015.101654. (In Persian).
- Goebel, C. J., and Cook, W. C., 1960. Effect of range condition on plant vigor, production, and nutritive value of forage. Journal of Range Management, 13(6): 307-313. doi:10.2307/3894056.
- Hossain, M. L., Li, J., Hoffmann, S. and Beierkuhnlein, C., 2022. Biodiversity showed positive effects on resistance but mixed effects on resilience to climatic extremes in a long-term grassland experiment. Science of the Total Environment. 25; 827:154322. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154322.
- Jiang, K., Tan, Z., He, Q., Wang, L., Zhao, Y., Sun, X., Hou, W., Long, W. and Zhang, H., 2020. Strong positively diversity-productivity relationships in the natural sub-alpine meadow communities across time are up to superior performers. Scientific Reports, 10(1):13353. doi:10.1038/s41598-020-70402-6
- Krebs, C.J., 2014. Ecological Methodology, 3rd ed. Benjamin/Cummings. 745p. url: https://www.zoology.ubc.ca/~krebs/books.html
- Magurran, A. E., 2004. Ecological diversity and its measurement. By Princeton University Press, New Jersey. 179p. doi: 10.1007/978-94-015-7358-0.
- Manoochehri, E., Bashari, H., Bassiri, M., and Saeedfar, M., 2014. Evaluating the performance of six range condition assessment approaches in semi-steppe rangelands of Central Zagros. Journal of Rangeland, 7(4):344-355. (In Persian). http://rangelandsrm.ir/article-1-241-en.html
- Mansouri, Z., Arzani, H., Moghaddamnia, A., Motamedi, J., and Khalighi Sigaroudi, S. 2022. Evaluation of meteorological factors in estimating forage production in steppe and semi-steppe rangelands of Iran. Journal of Rangeland Science, 12(1), 63-76. doi: 10.30495/rs.2022.681732
- Moetamedi, J. and Toupchizadegan, S., 2016. Allowable use of plant types in mountainous rangelands of Hendovan in West Azerbayjan. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 23(3):527-542. doi: 10.22092/ijrdr.2016.107610. (In Persian).
- Moghaddam, M.R., 2007. Range and range management. 4th ed. University of Tehran Press, Tehran, 470 p (In Persian).
- Mohammadi Moghaddam, S., Mosaedi, A, Jangju, M., and Mesdaghi, M., 2014. Modeling plants yield based on climatic factors and drought indices in selected sites of the provinces of Markazi and Qom in Iran. Water and Soil, 27(6):1190-1206. doi: 10.22067/jsw.v0i0.21057. (In Persian)
- Moshgani, M. and Rostampour, M., 2019. The survey of population dynamics of wild sheep in Darmian and Sarbisheh protected area and wild got in Shaskouh Protected Area, South Khorasan. Final report. Environmental Protection Agency of South Khorasan (in Persian).
- Naseri, S., Arastoo, B. and Parvaneh, T., 2021. Influence of climatic factors on forage production and Vegetation Cover of Iran's Upland Rangeland (Jashloobar Rangeland, Semnan Province). Journal of Rangeland Science, 11(4), 386-401.dor: 20.1001.1.20089996.2021.11.4.3.1
- Parker, K. W., 1954. Application of ecology in the determination of range condition and trend. Journal of Range Management, 7(1):14-23.doi: 10.2307/3894620
- Pielou, E.C., 1966. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collections. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 13: 131-144. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(66)90013-0.
- R Core Team, 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. URL https://www.R-project.org/.
- Rigi, M. and Fakhireh, A., 2013. Study of grazing intensities on plant species richness and diversity indices for preserving the ecosystems of Taftan’s rangelands. Journal of Plant Ecosystem Conservation; 1(3):105-118. url: http://pec.gonbad.ac.ir/article-1-73-en.html. (In Persian)
- Rostampour, M., Mashgani, M. and Akbari, H., 2019. A Study of Floristic, Functional, and Relative Diversity of Plant Families in Darmian and Sarbisheh Protected Area. Taxonomy and Biosystematics, 11(39): 75-96. doi: 10.22108/tbj.2020.119935.1101. (In Persian)
- Sanaei, A., Ali, A. and Zare Chahouki, M.A., 2018. The positive relationships between plant coverage, species richness, and aboveground biomass are ubiquitous across plant growth forms in semi-steppe rangelands. Journal of Environmental Management, 205:308-318. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.09.079.
- Sayre, N.F., 2017. The Politics of Scale, a History of Rangeland Science. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 288p. url: https://press.uchicago.edu/ucp/books/book/chicago/P/bo16762107.html
- Shannon, C.E. and Weaver, W., 1949. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL: The University of Illinois Press, 1-117.
- Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of Diversity. Nature, 163: 688-702. doi: 10.1038/163688a0.
- Stevens, C. J., 2018. Recent advances in understanding grasslands. 7(F1000 Faculty Rev):1363 .doi: 10.12688/f1000research.15050.1.
- Toranjzar, H., Abedi, M., Ahmadi, A. and Ahmadi, Z. 2009. Assessment of rangeland condition (health) in Meyghan desert of Arak. Journal of Rangeland, 3 (2):259-271. dor: 20.1001.1.20080891.1393.8.3.6.6. (In Persian)
- Veen, G. F., van der Putten, W. H. and Bezemer, T. M., 2018. Biodiversity-ecosystem functioning relationships in a long-term non-weeded field experiment. Ecology, 99(8):1836-1846 doi:10.1002/ecy.2400.
- Zeynivand, R., Ajorlo, M. and Ariapour, A., 2020. The Effect of grazing intensity livestock on Invader's species plant diversity in Kabirkuh foot (Slope) dareshar town. Journal of Plant Research (Iranian Journal of Biology), 32(4): 776-787. dor: 20.1001.1.23832592.1398.32.4.3.2 .(In Persian).
)