Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Assistant Professor, Range Research Division , Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension, AREEO, Tehran, Iran

10.22092/ijrdr.2026.135494

Abstract

Extended abstract
Background and objectives: Efforts for sustainable management of rangelands require evaluation and monitoring in different temporal and spatial scales. It is necessary to identify the most important climatic effects and how they affect vegetation factors in the field of optimal rangeland management. Sablan peak is the third highest peak in the country and is known as the livestock hub of Ardabil province. Considering the importance of Sablan rangelands in the economy and livelihood of the residents of the region, maintaining water and soil and other important services, it is necessary to organize a suitable management plan for its long-term use and to determine a model to predict the percentage of canopy cover and its biomass rate.
 
Materials and methods: For this purpose, basic and annual information on canopy percentage, biomass and condition, and climatic information such as rainfall and temperature are needed. Also, obtaining a model that can estimate the percentage of canopy cover and biomass with acceptable accuracy and precision without visiting in person; it is one of the priorities of rangeland management in the region. Based on this, in order to identify the most effective climate factors and determine the relevant model, Shabil Sabalan site in Ardabil province was evaluated and monitored for 5 years (2017-2021). Vegetative factors, including crown percentage of total cover and biomass rate, and functional factors, including rangeland condition and tendency, were evaluated during a 5-year period. Evaluations were carried out in a 50-hectare site named Shabil at the foot of Sablan Mountains in Lahrood section of Meshginshahr city with Festuca ovina-Bromus tomentellus-Onobrychis cornuta plant type. This site is a representative area for rangelands in the north of Sablan in terms of plant and functional traits. The key area of ​​two hectares with a height of 2805 meters inside the site was considered for the implementation of the plan and evaluation. The average long-term rainfall of 30 years leading to the year of its study is 460 mm. To analyze the data, General Linear Model test was used in Minitab 16 software. Pearson correlation test and stepwise regression were used to check and determine the correlation of environmental and vegetation data and to identify the most effective factors and predict the model.
 
 Results: The results of the evaluation of plant factors, the percentage of canopy coverage and biomass showed that the highest amount of coverage and biomass was obtained in one year after with the highest amount of rainfall. Therefore, the analysis of the variance of canopy percentage and biomass during the studied years was significant at the level of 1%. The results of the evaluation of the site-based or environmental factor of the rangeland condition also showed that the best amount of rangeland condition was obtained in years with more rainfall and more coverage and biomass. In examining the correlation between the studied indicators, the percentage of vegetation with autumn and winter rainfall showed a significant positive correlation at the level of 5%, but biomass was not correlated with any of the studied variables. The results of the step-by-step regression also showed that among the analyzed indicators, autumn and winter rainfall is the most effective factor in predicting the percentage of vegetation and total rainfall, and autumn and winter rainfall are also the most effective factors in predicting biomass at a probability level of 5% were in the region.
 
Conclusion: The three important indicators of canopy percentage, biomass and condition have performed well in showing the difference of different years, but the vegetation index has the highest correlation and due to the ease of vegetation evaluation compared to biomass evaluation, therefore the annual evaluation of canopy percentage Coverage as the most important factor can help in determining the prediction model. With the continuation of data collection, stronger and more accurate models can be obtained to estimate the canopy percentage and the amount of biomass

Keywords

1- Akbarzadeh, M., 2005. Vegetation changes inside and outside the Roud Shoor exclusion. Iranian Rangeland and Desert Research Quarterly, 12: 188-167348 (In Persian).
2- Alimahmodi Sarab S, Tarnian F., 2022. Mapping of forage Production in Poor Rangelands Haftkel Rangelands Using Sentile-2 Images. Journal of Rangeland,16(3):497-509.(In Persian).
3- Arzani, H., and King G. W., 1994. A double Sampling Australian Rangel and Conference, pp.201-202.
4- Arzani H, Kabuli, S H., Mirdavoodi, H. R., Farahpour, M and Azimi. M.S., 2008. Evaluation of ETM + sensor data capability in estimating vegetation of rangelands in arid areas - a case study of Markazi province. Scientific-Research Quarterly. Iranian Range and Desert Research, Volume 15, Number 3, Pages 320-348 (In Persian).
5- Arzani, H. Farahpour, M., Abdollahi, J., Azimi, Mojgan Sadat., Jafari. A.A., and Moallemi, M., 2015. Investigating the trend of changes in rangeland status in a 5-year period in Yazd province. Scientific-Research Quarterly. Iranian Range and Desert Research. Volume No. 12 Issue 3. Pages 263-286348 (In Persian).
6- Arzani, H. and Shahriari, A., 2017. Monitoring for Ecology and Conservation, University of Tehran Press348 (In Persian).
7-Bahreini F, Panahi F, Malekian A, Tahmoures M., 2023. Evaluation of rangeland gross primary productivity sensitivity potential to drought using ecosystem modelling. Journal of Rangeland,17(1):15-31.(In Persian).
8- Bates, J.D., Svejcar, A.J., Angell, R.F., Miller, R.F., 2005, The effects of precipitation timing on Sagebrush steppe vegetation, Journal of Range Management, 64:670-697.
9-Bork, E. W. T. Thomas and McDougall, B., 2001. Herbage response to precipitation in central Alberta boreal grasslands. Journal of Range Management. 54:243-248.
10- -Canfield, R.H., 1941. Application of line interception method on sampling range vegetation, Journal of forest, 39:388-394. 
11- Duncan, D., and Wood manse, R.G., 1975. Forecasting forage yield from precipitation in California's annual rangeland, Journal of Range Management, 28(4).
12-Dyksterhius, E.J., 1949. Condition and management of range land based upon quantitative ecology journal of Range management. 2(3):104-115.
13- Ehsani, A., H. Arzani, M. Farahpour, H. Ahmadi, M. Jafari, A. Jalili, H.R. Abasi, M.S. Azimi & Mirdavoudi, H.R., 2007. The effect of climatic conditions on range forage biomass in steppe Rangelands, Akhtarabad of Saveh. J. of Range and Desert Research, 14 (2):249-260, (In Persian).
14-Eftekhari, A., Fayaz, M., Khodagholi, M., Mozafarian, V., Jafari, A.A, Masoumi, A.A., Ehsani, A., Khalifehzadeh, R., Zandi Esfahan, E., Nateghi, S., Bayat, M., Goudarzi, M., Khaksarian, F & Mehrabi, A., F, 2021, Rangeland Ecosystem monitoring in different climate regions of Iran, The Final Report of national research Project, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, 1217page, (In Persian).
15- Heady, H.F. and Child. R.D., 1994. Rangeland Ecology and Management. West View Press. 519pp.
16-Holecheck, J.L., R.D. Pipper, & Herbel., C.H., 2004. Range Management (Principles and Practices), Fifth Edition.
17- Koc. A., 2001. Autumn and Spring drought periods affect vegetation on high elevation Range land of Turkey, Journal of Range Management. 54:622-627.
18- Le Houerou H.N and Hoste. C.H., 1977. Rangeland biomass and annual rainfall relations in the Mediterranean basin and in the African Sahelo-Sudanian Zone. Journal of Range management.30 (3):181-189.
19- Luna-Kamyshev, N. M., J. O. López-Martínez, B. Vargas-Larreta, G. A., Islebe, T. F. Villalobos-Guerrero, A. V., de la Rosa, O. F. Reyes-Mendoza & E. Treviño-Garza, 2020. Floristic Composition, Diversity, and Biomass of a Protected Tropical Evergreen Forest Belize. Tropical Conservation Science, 13: 1–13
20- Mesdaghi, M, 2004, Range management in Iran, Astane Ghods Razavi press, 333 p, (In Persian).
21- Moghadam, M.R., 2000, Range and range management, Tehran university press, 470p, (In Persian).
22- Mohammadi Golrang, b., 1994. Survey of vegetation changes in Amir Kabir Dam (Karaj) during the last 20 years (1988-2008), Master Thesis in Range Management, Faculty of Natural Resources, Gorgan University, 348 (In Persian).
23-Moetamedi, J., Arzani, H., Jafari, M., Farahpour, M & Zarechahouki, M, A., 2019, A model for estimating long-term grazing capacity, Iranian Range and Desert Research, Volume 26, Number 1, Pages 241-259 (In Persian).
24- Muir, S., M and Mc Claran, P., 1997. Rangeland Inventory, Monitoring, and Evaluation, http://Rangelands west.org/az/ inventory monitoring /index.html.
25-Omar.S.A.S., 1990. Influence of precipitation on vegetation in the rangelands of Kuwait. Proceeding of the second international conference on Range management in the Persian Gulf. Kuwait: 126-138.
26- Rostampoor M, Sabzi R., 2022. Effect of slope gradient on vegetation, species composition and production of medicinal plants (Case study: Rom Rangelands, Qaen). Journal of Rangeland, 16(2):312-330. (In Persian).
27- sanaee Z, ebrahimi A., 2023. Estimation and Comparison of Natural Ranges and Abandoned Rangelands Using Remote Sensing-Based Vegetation Indices: A Case Study of Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari Province Rangelands. Journal of Rangeland, 17(2):165-178.(In Persian).
28- Sharifi, J and M, Akbarzadeh., 2016. A review of the effect of inclosure on the changes in vegetation cover and the restoration of the indicator species of rangeland in Ardabil province. Journal of rangeland, 10(4):376-386.
29- Shiflet, T. and Harland, D., 1974. Relationship between precipitation and annual rangeland herbage biomass in southeastern Kansas, Journal of Range Management, 27(4(:272-276.
30- Ward, W. Brady, John E. Mitchell, Charles, D.  Bonham and Cock, J., 1995. Assessing the power of the point- line transect to monitor changes in plant basal cover. Journal of Range Management, 48:187-190.