Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Rangeland Research Division, Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Research Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources, Tehran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Tehran, Iran

10.22092/ijrdr.2023.130623

Abstract

Background & Objectives
Considering the extent of rangeland areas as well as the limited capabilities of the government in managing these areas, the issue of using potentials outside of the government management system to protect national areas has been raised by some experts. One of these abilities is the presence of people who are continuously present in the rangelands. The key question is this, whether rangeland utilizers optimally managed these fields as in the past? The answer to the question required an investigation of the phenomenon under the prevailing conditions. For this purpose, the issue of the "feasibility of reassigning range management to nomads and investigating its effects" in the pilot areas was recognized as reasonable.
 
Methodology
After holding several meetings, the summer rangelands of Dasht Lar, Tehran's Hadavand tribe were chosen as a pilot, and a memorandum of understanding was concluded between the representatives of the nomads and some related government bodies regarding the transfer of the management of the selected rangelands to the representatives of the nomads and the government's support for them. The implementation of the 4-year project started in 2014 with "action research" studies. Evaluations were done using two standard research methods, quantitative and qualitative. Qualitative evaluation of the performance of nomadic representatives in the management of nomads and rangelands. This evaluation quantitatively also included the impact of this management method on vegetation cover indicators. To carry out the last phase after rangeland typing, considering the rangeland area, vegetation changes, accuracy, and study time, 20 plots of 1 square meter were established along two transects of 500 meters. By the random-systematic sampling method, rangeland capacity indicators were calculated by cutting and weighing method, condition trend with trend scale, and exploitation percentage using production difference before the nomads entered and after they left the rangeland.
 
Results
The qualitative part of the study revealed that this management method had an average success rate of 40% in the region. The lack of serious volition of the custodian organization in transferring management to the nomads, the lack of allocation of government funds for the implementation of the programs and projects predicted by the nomad representatives, and the protection of the region were analyzed as influential reasons for the complete failure of the management decisions of the nomad representatives. The results of quantitative evaluations also showed that the status of the systems during the research period, the average, and the trend of the situation remained the same. Except for the customary central Kammerdasht (which was negative), all other systems were positive. In each year, the exploitation percentage was higher than the allowed limit (50%), ranging from 0.72 to 1.26. The variance analysis also demonstrated the effect of year on most of the investigated indicators at two levels of 5% and 1% significance. Comparing the averages also showed that, except for utilization percentage, other indicators had an increasing trend.
 
Conclusion
In general, the management of nomadic representatives was evaluated as successful in improving the conditions of summer rangelands in the Ghoshkhaneh basin of the Lar Plain, so it seems that establishing the official presence of natural and legal representatives of nomads in the management of rangelands can be effective in improving the coverage of the area.

Keywords

  • , 2016.Nomadic Affairs Management Site of Tehran Province. http://www.ashayertehran.ir. (In Persian).
  • Bajian, G.H., 2007. A Review of Pasture Management in Nomadic Society in the Past and Present, Changes, Challenges and Strategies, Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, Volume 14, Number 4, pp. 524-538. (In Persian).
  • Behzad, T., 2012. Grazing management. Forests, Rangelands and Watershed Management Organization, Rangeland Affairs Office. (in Persian).
  • Bozorghi, Mah Roud., Ghorbani, Mehdi., 2015. Analyzing the stockholders, social power and net work analysis on the natural resources management, M.sc theses of combating desertification. Faculty of natural resources, Tehran University (in Persian).
  • Child, B., Dalal-Clayton, B., 2004. Transforming approaches to CBNRM: Learning from the Luangwa experience in Zambia, in McShane, T.O., Wells, M.P. (Eds), Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Toward more Effective Conservation and Development, New York: Columbia University Press.
  • Ghorbani, Mehdi., Azarnivand, Hosein., Mehrabi, Ali- Akbar., Bastani, Sosan., Jafari, Mohammad., Naiebi, Hoshangh., 2013. Network analysis, new paradigm in programming co operational management of natural resources. Journal of Rangelands and Watershed Management. Volume 65. N: 4. 568-553 ( in Persian).
  • Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B.J., Acheson, J.M.( 1996). The tragedy of the Commons: Twenty years later, Human Ecology 18(1), 1-19.
  • Hutton, J., Adams, W.M., Murombedzi, J.C., 2005. Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity conservation, Forum for Development Studies 2, 341-70
  • Jones, B.T.B., Murphree, M.W., 2004. Community-based natural resource management as a conservation mechanism: Lessons and directions, in Child, B. (Ed.) Parks in Transition: Biodiversity, Rural Development, and the Bottom Line, London: Earthscan.
  • Mohebbi, A., 2017. Participatory Management Framework for Physical Protection of Rangelands. Iranian Nature Magazine.  Volume 7, Number 1, Consecutive 32.32-. 25 .  (In Persian).
  • Mohebbi, A; Fayyaz, M; and Seyed Akhlaghi, S. J., 2017. Investigation of migration and rangeland management situation and feasibility study of its transfer to nomadic organizations (case study of Ardabil, Tehran, Khuzestan and Chaharmahal and Bakhtiari provinces). Final report of the project, Forest and Rangeland Research Institute. p. 450 (in Persian).
  • Mohebbi, A., Farzizadeh, Z., Rosemary. B., 2021. Assessment of the management of tribal people Range lands on the bases of grazing license (Case study: Tribal people of Tehran, Ardabil, Chaharmahalo Bakhtiiari and Khozestan provinces). Under study project.. Unpublished. RIFR. p. 560 (in Persian).
  • Murphree, M.W., 2004. Communal approaches to natural resource management in Africa: From whence and to where?, Journal of International Wildlife Law and Policy 7, pp. 203-16.
  • Najafi, Bahauddin., 2005. The role of nomads in the economical development of Iran. National conference of organizing Iranian nomadic community, Tehran. https://civilica.com/doc/352468.
  • Nelson, F., Agrawal, A., 2008. Patronage or Participation? Community-based Natural Resource Management Reform in Sub-Saharan Africa, Development and Change 39(4), pp. 557-85.
  • Poissonnet, M., Brudo, V., Dosso, M., 2006. La forêt protégée de Kakamega (Ouest Kenya) entre deux futurs immédiats: destruction annoncée ou gestion?”, Cahiers Agricultures 15(5), pp. 409-15.
  • Randrianalijaona, T.M., 2008. Gestion communautaire des ressources naturelles et développement durable, PhD, University of Antananarivo.
  • Vermeulin, C., 1997. Problématique de la décentralisation des forêts communautaires en forêt dense humide, Sud Est Cameroun, The African Rainforest and the Conservation of Biodiversity Workshop, Limbé, January.   17-24.
  • Yousefi, M. and Behbahani, N., 2014. Sustainable Management of Natural Resources Based on Participation of Local Communities (Successful Experience of International Project - RFLDL South Khorasan, Sarayan) Article Published on http://nrskh.ir/article (in Persian).