همکاری با انجمن علمی مدیریت و کنترل مناطق بیابانی ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای علوم و مهندسی آبخیزداری، گروه مهندسی منابع طبیعی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

2 دانشیار، گروه مهندسی منابع طبیعی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

3 استادیار، گروه مهندسی منابع طبیعی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه هرمزگان، بندرعباس، ایران

4 استادیار پژوهش، بخش حفاظت خاک و آبخیزداری، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان یزد، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، یزد، ایران

چکیده

خشکسالی می­تواند تولید پایدار و ثابت اکوسیستم­های طبیعی ازجمله مراتع را کاهش دهد. هدف اصلی این پژوهش، پهنه‌بندی آسیب‌پذیری خشکسالی مراتع در حوزه آبخیز پیشکوه استان یزد بوده است. در این پژوهش از سامانه اطلاعات جغرافیایی و روش تصمیم‌گیری چند­معیاره­ (AHP) استفاده شد. در این راستا، پارامترهای تأثیر­گذار بر آسیب‌پذیری خشکسالی مراتع منطقه مطالعاتی که شامل پارامترهای شیب، جهت شیب، بارش، بافت خاک و تبخیر بودند استخراج گردید و به‌کمک (GIS) به لایه­های اطلاعاتی تبدیل شد. پس از وزن­دهی لایه­ها از لحاظ اهمیت در آسیب­پذیری خشکسالی در چارچوب تصمیم­گیری چند­معیاره (MCDM)، تلفیق و نقشه نهایی آسیب­پذیری خشکسالی منطقه مطالعاتی تهیه گردید. همچنین به‌منظور کنترل و دقت‌سنجی نقشه نهایی، از مطالعات میدانی محدوده مطالعاتی نیز کمک گرفته شد. در پایان، نقشه تیپ غالب گیاهی مرتعی تهیه و با نقشه آسیب­پذیری خشکسالی مراتع منطقه مطالعاتی همپوشانی انجام شد تا مقاوم­ترین و آسیب­پذیرترین تیپ ­گیاهی مرتعی شناسایی گردد. نتایج نشان داد که بیشترین وزن پارامترهای مؤثر در آسیب‌پذیری خشکسالی مراتع مربوط به پارامتر بارش مقدار آن برابر با 54/0 و کمترین وزن مربوط به پارامتر شیب با مقدار 061/0 است. براساس نتایج بدست آمده، نواحی شرقی، جنوب‌شرقی و جنوبی حوزه آبخیز پیشکوه دارای بیشترین میزان آسیب‌پذیری خشکسالی مراتع و تیپ Ar.au-St.ba.Sc.or آسیب­پذیرترین تیپ گیاهی منطقه مطالعاتی است. بنابراین توصیه می‌شود منابع و راهکارهای مدیریتی بیشتری در مراتع آسیب­پذیر به‌منظور حفاظت از خاک و پوشش گیاهی آن اجرا گردد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Assessment Rangelands Drought Vulnerability in Arid and semi-arid regions (Case Study: Pishkouh Watershed, Yazd Province)

نویسندگان [English]

  • mohammad ekrami 1
  • rasool mahdavi 2
  • mazieh rezaei 3
  • hassan vagharfard 2
  • Jalal Barkhordari 4

1 PhD student of Watershed Sciences and Engineering-water, Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

3 Assistant Professor, Department of Natural Resources Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Hormozgan, Bandar Abbas, Iran

4 Assistant Professor, Soil Conservation and Watershed Management Research Department, Yazd Agriculture and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO,Yazd, Iran center,AREEO, Yazd, Iran

چکیده [English]

      Drought can reduce the sustainable production of natural ecosystems, including rangelands. The main purpose of this study was to expand the vulnerability of rangelands drought in the Pishkuh watershed in Yazd province. In the present study, geographical information systems and multi-criteria decision-making method (AHP) were used. In this regard, the parameters affecting the drought vulnerability of rangelands of the study area, including slope, slope direction, precipitation, soil texture, and evaporation were extracted and converted into information layers with the help of GIS. After weighing the layers in terms of importance in drought vulnerability in the framework of multi-criteria decision making (MCDM), the final combination and drought vulnerability map of the study area was prepared. Also, to control and measure the final map, field studies of the study area were used. Finally, a map of the dominant rangeland vegetation type was prepared and overlapped with the drought vulnerability map of the rangelands of the study area to identify the most resistant and vulnerable rangeland vegetation type. The results showed that the highest weight of the effective parameters in rangeland drought vulnerability was related to the precipitation with a value of 0.54, and the lowest weight was related to the slope with a value of 0.061. Based on the results, the eastern, southeastern, and southern regions of the Pishkuh watershed have the highest rate of rangelands drought vulnerability, and Ar.au-St.ba.Sc.or type is the most vulnerable vegetation type in the study area. It is recommended that more management resources and strategies be implemented in vulnerable rangelands to protect the soil and its vegetation.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Ecosystem
  • Plant Type
  • Drought management
  • Degradation
  • GIS
-  Abdollahi, J., Arzani, H., Naderi, H. and Mirjalili, M.R., 2014. Range forage production response to rainfall and temperature variability in Garize-Sofla area, Yazd. Journal of Watershed Management Researches, 27(2):165-174.
-  Abdollahi, J., Arzani, H. and Naderi, H., 2011. Effective climatic factors on forage production in steppe Nedooshan rangeland in Yazd province. Journal of Rangeland, 5(1):45-55.
-  Andrea, M., Ákos, N. and Zita, B., 2012. Estimation and mapping of drought vulnerability on the basis of climate, land use and soil parameters using GIS technique. Final conference of DMCSEE project Ljubljana, 15th May, 2012.
-  Arshad, S., Morid, S., Mobasheri, M. R. and Agha Alikhani, M., 2008. Development of agricultural drought vulnerability assessment model for Kermanshah Province using stochastic and intelligent methods. Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, 9 (3): 1-22.
-  Assal, T. J., Anderson, P. J. and Sibold, J., 2016. Spatial and temporal trends of drought effects in a heterogeneous semi-arid forest ecosystem. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 365: 137-151.
-  Bagheri, S., Jafari, M., Heydari, M. and Tavili, A., 2012. Assessment of rangeland vulnerability to droughts based on soil moisture (Case Study: Hasanjoun Basin Taleghan). 2nd National Conference on Health, Environment and Sustainable Development, Bandar Abbas, Islamic Azad University of Bandar Abbas Branch.
-  Baghestani Maybodi, N. and Dashtakian, k., 2015. Ecological Regions of Iran- Vegetation Types of Yazd province. Research Institute of Forests and Rangelands AREEO. Release number455.978-964-473-370-3.
-  Baguskas, S. A., Peterson, S. H., Bookhagen, B. and Still, C. J., 2014. Evaluating spatial patterns of drought-induced tree mortality in a coastal California pine forest. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 315: 43-53.
-  Bahreini, F. and Pahlevanravi, A., 2013. Assess and mapping the environmental sensitivity to desertification (a Case Study in Boushehr Province, Southwest IRAN), International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences, 5(18): 217.
-  Bordi, I., Frigio, S., Parenti, P., Speranza, A. and Sutera, A., 2001. The analysis of the standardized precipitation index in the Mediterranean area: large scale patterns. Journal of Annals of Geophysical, 44: 965–978.
-  Boultif, M. and Benmessaoud, H., 2017. AGIS-based methodology for drought vulnerability modelling: applicationatthe region of EL Hodna, central Algeria. Lebanese Science Journal, 18(1), p.53.
-  Boultif, M. and Benmessaoud, H., 2017. Using climate-soil-socioeconomic parameters for a drought vulnerability assessment in a semi-arid region: Application at the region of El Hodna, (M’sila, and Algeria). Geographica Pannonica, 21(3):142-150.
-  Dabanlia, I., 2018. Drought risk assessment by using drought hazard and vulnerability indexes. Journal of National Hazards Earth System Sciense. https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-2018-129, 2018.
-  Dorman, M., Svoray, T., Perevolotsky, A. and Sarris, D., 2013. Forest performance during two consecutive drought periods: diverging long-term trends and short-term responses along a climatic gradient. Journal of Forest Ecology and Management, 310: 1-9.
-  Ebrahimi, A. and Hoseini, M., 2001. An investigating on environmental, economic and social effects of drought and its coping strategies in the nomadic society. the first national conference on water crisis, University of Zabol.
-  Ehsani, A., Arzani, H., Farahpor, M., Ahmadi, H., Jafari., M., Jalili, A., Mirdavodi, H.R., Abasi, H.R. and Azimi, M.S., 2007. The effect of climatic condition on range forage production in steppe rangelands, Akhtarabad of Saveh, Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 14(3): 260 - 269.
-  Fakhimi Abarghoee, E., Arzani, H. and Soltani Gerd faramarzi, M., 2019. Performance evaluation of the "water balance model" to estimate long-term production in rangeland of Shirkooh, Yazd province, Iran, 12: (4)519-531.
-  Fatehi Marj, A. and Hosseini Hossein Abadi. F., 2012. developing an agricultural drought risk management plan in Alamoot province pilot. Tehran Soil Conservasion and watershed management research institute pub., P. 185.
-  Ferrara, A., Salvati, L., Sateriano, A. and Nolè, A., 2012. Performance evaluation and costs assessment of a key indicator system to monitor desertification vulnerability. Ecological Indicators, 23: 123-129.
-  Ghodsi-pour, S. H., 2007. Analytical hierarchy process (AHP), Amirkabir University of Tech. Pub., Tehranl.
-  Guttman, N. B., 1999. Accepting the standardized precipitation index: a calculation algorithm. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 35: 311–322.
-  Jiang, S., Yang, R., Cui, N., Zhao, L. and Liang, C., 2018. Analysis of drought vulnerability characteristics and risk assessment based on information distribution and diffusion in Southwest China.Journal of Atmosphere, 9(7):239-245.
-  Karabulut, M., 2002. An examination of relationships between vegetation and rainfall using weather variable. Journal of Range management, 6(42): 525-540.
-  Karamouz, M., Zeynolabedin, A. and Olyaei, M. A., 2015. Mapping regional drought vulnerability: A Case Study. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing & Spatial Information Sciences, 40.
-  Keyantash, J. and Dracup, J. A., 2002. The quantification of drought: an evaluation of drought indices. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 83(8), 1167-1180.
-  Khalighi Sigaroudi, S. H., Sadeghi Sangdehi, S. A., Awsati, K. H. and GHavidel Rahimi, Y., 2009. The Study of drought and wet year assessment models for stations in Mazandaran province. Iranian journal of Range and Desert Reseach, 16 (1): 44-54.
-  Khumalo, G. F. and Holechek, J., 2005. Relationship between Chihuahuan desert perennial grass production and precipitation. Journal of Raneland and Ecology management, 58(3):239-246.
-  Maja, S., Gregor, G., Klemen, B. and Samo, S., 2010. Assessing and mapping drought vulnerability in agricultural Systems – A case Study for Slovenia. 10thEMS/8thECACZürich, 13. September 2010.
-  Mishra, A. K. and Singh, V.P., 2010. A review of drought concepts. Journal of Hydrology, 391: 202–216.
-  Rossi, G., Castignione, L. and Bonaccorso, B., 2007. Guidelines for planning and implementing drought mitigation measures. In: Rossi G, Vega T, Bonaccorso B (eds) Methods and tools from drought analysis and management, Ch 16, Springer, AA Dordrecht, The Netherlands 325–347.
-  Saaty, T. L., 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. McGraw-Hill, New York.
-  Sabaghpour, S. H., 2008. Indicators and measures of drought tolerance in plants. 10th Congress of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Tehran, Aboureihan Campus, University of Tehran. https://www.civilica.com/Paper-NABATAT10-NABATAT10_042.html.
-  Saghafi Khadem, F., Ehsani, A. and Shahabi, M., 2016. Effects of drought and wetness conditions on the phenology of main species inBinaloud rangeland of Khorasan Razavi province. Iranian Journal of Range and Desert Research, 23 (1): 92-107.
-  Salem, J., 2008. The effect of drought on the tribal life of the tribe Taheri in the province of Tabas. Village and Development, 11: 89-124.
-  Sharafi, L. W. and Zarafshani, K., 2010. Measuring economic and social vulnerability of farmers against drought, Case study: Wheat farmers in Kermanshah, Sahneh and Ravansar Counties. Journal of Rural Researches, 4: 129-154.
-  Sharafi, L. W. and Zarafshani, K., 2011. Vulnerability assessment, the point of starting of risk management in drought, Journal of Regional Planning, 1: 43-56.
-  Sodaii zadeh, H., Shamsaie, M., Tajamoliyan, M., Mirmohammady maibody, A. M. and Hakim zadeh, M. A., 2016. The effects of water stress on some morphological and physiological characteristics of Satureja hortensis. Journal of  Plant Process and Function, 5 (15):1-12.
-  Sohrabi, F., Saghari, M., Fatahi, B. and Rostampour, M., 2017. Influence of slope direction on some vegetation characteristics in western Zagros rangelands (Case study: Sarias-Paveh rangelands). The First National and International Conference of Environmental sciences, Agriculture and Natural Resources.
-  Thomas, M. T. and Gausling, T., 2000. Morphological and physiological responses of oak (Quercuspet raea and Q.robur) to moderat drought. Annals of Forest Science, 57:325-333.
-  Wilhelmi, O.V. and Wilhite, D. A., 2002. Assessing vulnerability to agricultural drought: A Nebraska Case Study. Natural Hazards, 25: 37–58.
-  Wilhite, D. A. and Glantz, M. H., 1985. Understanding: the drought phenomenon: the role of definitions. Journal of Water international, 10(3): 111-120.
-  Wilhite, D. A. and Vanyarkho, O., 2000. Drought: Pervasive impacts of a creeping phenomenon. In: DA Wilhite, ed. Drought: A Global Assessment (Volume I, pp. 245–255). London: Rout ledge Publishers.
-  Yaghmaei, L., Soltani, S., Jafari, R., Bashari, H. and Jahanbazi, H., 2017. An investigation on impact of drought on rangeland and forest vegetation changes in Chaharmahal & Bakhtiari province using MODIS satellite dat, Iranian Journal of Forest and Range Protection Research, 15 (1): 91-108.
-  Zarrinabadi, E. and Vaezi, A. R., 2016. Runoff and soil loss as affected by land use change and plough direction in poor vegetation cover pastures, Iranian Journal of Soil and Water Research, 47(1), 87-98.